IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexei Masanko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — OJHL 31 12 18 92.5% 2.83 1 0.9700 77.5%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 2 0 2 81.1% 10.64 —
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 1 0 1 84.4% 8.44 0
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 6 1 3 91.3% 3.27 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Luke Lush AJHL 91.9% 77.5% Sacred Heart 91.5% 2.11
Daniel Hauser WHL 91.3% 76.6% Wisconsin 90.0% 2.49
Aaron Matthews NCDC 90.7% 77.9% Providence — —
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 79.5% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Ryan Snowden USHL 89.8% 76.4% Ohio State 90.5% 2.52
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jeffrey Dreger MJHL 86.4% 77.7% SUNY Morrisville D3 84.5% 4.37
Nikolas Trakakis MJHL 87.9% 78.3% Chatham D3 93.4% 2.45
Vincent Lamberti BCHL 88.8% 76.8% Amherst D3 90.2% 2.47
Paul Knapik USPHL-Premier 90.5% 77.5% Roger Williams D3 — —
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 78.2% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.