← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dawson Rodin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-02-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 NOJHL 34 16 10 92.8% 2.34 4 0.9700 78.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2020-21 Marian D3 2 0 1 91.7% 3.34 0
2019-20 Marian D3 4 0 2 89.3% 3.24 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Jacob Zacharewicz NAHL 89.2% 79.5% Brown 86.8% 4.19
Luke Lush AJHL 91.9% 77.5% Sacred Heart 91.5% 2.11
Aaron Matthews NCDC 90.7% 77.9% Providence
Teagan Kendrick BCHL 91.5% 80.5% Sacred Heart 92.0% 2.42
Thomas Heaney NAHL 90.0% 80.4% UConn 86.7% 4.39
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Anthony Bonaldi USPHL-Premier 90.6% 78.2% Nichols D3 81.8% 7.78
Josh Nadler AJHL 89.5% 78.8% Hamilton D3 68.8% 12.03
Nikolas Trakakis MJHL 87.9% 78.3% Chatham D3 93.4% 2.45
Jeffrey Dreger MJHL 86.4% 77.7% SUNY Morrisville D3 84.5% 4.37
Colby Entz SJHL 89.8% 79.2% St. Norbert D3 93.0% 1.88

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.