← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Gibbons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
EC Bad Nauheim · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 14 15 29 0.518 0.3184 0.3175 1.5258 1.5214
2018-19 Deggendorfer SC DEL2 52 25 35 60 1.154 0.4977 0.4736
2019-20 EC Bad Nauheim DEL2 15 5 1 6 0.400 0.1726 0.1726
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Canisius D1 AHA SR 41 15 23 38 0.927
2012-13 Canisius D1 AHA JR 42 21 22 43 1.024
2011-12 Canisius D1 AHA SO 32 11 15 26 0.812
2010-11 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 10 13 23 0.622
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2010-11 · Canisius
+128.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14819
Forward overall
#563
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.