← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Czarnik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 23 8 14 22 0.957 0.7417 0.7830 3.5600 3.7583
2009-10 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 61 22 32 54 0.885 0.6864 0.6879 3.2946 3.3019
2010-11 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 46 20 14 34 0.739 0.4543 0.4670 2.1775 2.2386
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2024-25 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2023-24 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2022-23 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2021-22 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2020-21 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 33 2 6 8 0.242
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC SR 40 9 36 45 1.125
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC JR 37 13 34 47 1.270
2012-13 Miami D1 CCHA-orig SO 42 14 26 40 0.952
2011-12 Miami D1 CCHA-orig FR 40 10 27 37 0.925
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2011-12 · Miami
+78.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4219
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.