← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Shore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-26 Country: USA
2011 · Round 3, Pick #82  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 16 7 6 13 0.812 0.6039 0.6312 3.0318 3.1687
2009-10 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 39 13 24 37 0.949 0.7052 0.6993 3.5400 3.5105
2018-19 Metallurg Magnitogorsk KHL 37 3 13 16 0.432 1.0810 1.1493 5.9579 6.3344
2021-22 Sibir Novosibirsk KHL 49 10 16 26 0.531 1.3265 1.1925 7.3110 6.5722
2022-23 HV71 SHL 25 5 13 18 0.720 1.8000 1.5287 9.3950 7.9789
2023-24 HV71 SHL 39 13 18 31 0.795 1.9873 1.5594 10.3723 8.1392
2024-25 Linköping HC SHL 43 8 14 22 0.512 1.2790 0.9287 6.6757 4.8476
2025-26 Linköping HC SHL 50 11 17 28 0.560 1.4000 1.4000 7.3072 7.3072
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Denver D1 WCHA-orig JR 39 14 20 34 0.872
2011-12 Denver D1 WCHA-orig SO 43 13 28 41 0.954
2010-11 Denver D1 WCHA-orig FR 33 7 11 18 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.63
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2010-11 · Denver
-12.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#462
Forward overall
#29
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
1.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.