← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Cheyenne Friesen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2010-02-01 Country: USA Height: 5'5" (165 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Boston College
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.03
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0357
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.09
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.0992
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
80%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 16U-AAA-W 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0357 0.0357
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Paige Michel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.348 UConn
Brinna Dochniak USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.111 RIT
Grace Bowlby USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.316 Wisconsin
Heather Olson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Xylia Lang USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.091 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Lydia Walsh 2022-23 · 0.25 PPG Elmira UCHC
Caroline Thompson 2022-23 · 0.31 PPG 0.320 Southern Maine NEHC
Sophie Johnson 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG 0.143 St. Scholastica NCHA
Anika Mader 2021-22 · 0.25 PPG Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Jordan Caroccio 2022-23 · 0.33 PPG 0.280 Canton SUNYAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.