IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gregory Kreutzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Eispiraten Crimmitschau · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 53 1 8 9 0.170 0.0834 0.0879 0.4534 0.4781
2018-19 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 64 3 28 31 0.484 0.2380 0.2394 1.2935 1.3011
2019-20 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 63 3 32 35 0.556 0.2730 0.2730 1.4836 1.4836
2020-21 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 8 0 3 3 0.375 0.1842 0.1842 1.0014 1.0014
2021-22 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 41 2 14 16 0.390 0.5227 0.7028 0.7002 0.9415
2022-23 Fischtown Pinguins DEL 42 1 5 6 0.143 0.3573 0.4667 1.2115 1.5824
2023-24 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 38 3 13 16 0.421 0.5641 0.6657 0.7556 0.8916
2024-25 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 52 4 26 30 0.577 0.7728 0.8724 1.0352 1.1686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Buffalo ACHA_D1 — — 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6832
Defenseman overall
#1389
Defenseman born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.