IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zac Larraza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-25 Country: USA
2011 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  Phoenix Coyotes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — NTDP-U18 51 8 10 18 0.353 0.2623 0.2656 1.3168 1.3332
2010-11 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 57 9 9 18 0.316 0.2347 0.2276 1.1784 1.1429
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Denver D1 NCHC SR 38 12 8 20 0.526
2013-14 Denver D1 NCHC JR 34 10 10 20 0.588
2012-13 Denver D1 WCHA-orig SO 36 12 9 21 0.583
2011-12 Denver D1 WCHA-orig FR 26 1 4 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2011-12 · Denver
-7.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23499
Forward overall
#817
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arturas Laukaitis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.