IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Talcott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1342 0.5892 0.6432
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 51 7 8 15 0.294 0.1808 0.1878 0.8665 0.8999
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 57 9 11 20 0.351 0.2157 0.2139 1.0338 1.0253
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27983
Forward overall
#1094
Forward born in 1995
#2691
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Resnick
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.