← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Gill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-27 Country: Canada
2023 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #145  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 50 5 7 12 0.240 0.1193 0.1193 0.6401 0.6401
2020-21 QMJHL 34 6 15 21 0.618 0.3071 0.3071 1.6471 1.6471
2021-22 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 68 20 26 46 0.676 0.3364 0.3324 1.8042 1.7829
2022-23 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 68 44 49 93 1.368 0.6800 0.6388 3.6474 3.4262
2023-24 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 65 40 58 98 1.508 0.7496 0.6672 4.0210 3.5789
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 36 16 19 35 0.972
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2025-26 · Merrimack
+59.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3517
Forward overall
#76
Forward born in 2003
#85
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.