← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Côté Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 34 17 8 25 0.735 0.3656 0.3656 1.9610 1.9610
2021-22 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 64 26 30 56 0.875 0.4350 0.4615 2.3336 2.4758
2022-23 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 31 15 11 26 0.839 0.4170 0.4220 2.2368 2.2637
2023-24 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 32 35 67 0.985 0.4899 0.4716 2.6278 2.5299
2024-25 Québec Remparts QMJHL 54 32 27 59 1.093 0.5432 0.4962 2.9140 2.6620
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC 38 11 8 19 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Clarkson
+20.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5540
Forward overall
#170
Forward born in 2004
#263
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.