IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Oliver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 38 9 13 22 0.579 0.2844 0.2844 1.5458 1.5458
2021-22 — QMJHL 69 23 18 41 0.594 0.2919 0.3094 1.5867 1.6819
2022-23 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 63 20 19 39 0.619 0.3041 0.3075 1.6529 1.6712
2023-24 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 35 36 71 1.044 0.5130 0.4934 2.7881 2.6814
2024-25 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 63 50 28 78 1.238 0.6083 0.5551 3.3061 3.0171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 32 2 8 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2025-26 · New Hampshire
-36.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5581
Forward overall
#152
Forward born in 2004
#186
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.