← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Carr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 38 1 11 12 0.316 0.1570 0.1644 0.8422 0.8816
2022-23 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 52 4 15 19 0.365 0.1817 0.1813 0.9745 0.9725
2023-24 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 61 7 24 31 0.508 0.2527 0.2397 1.3554 1.2858
2024-25 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 62 6 39 45 0.726 0.3609 0.3246 1.9357 1.7410
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 35 2 5 7 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · New Hampshire
-27.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3402
Defenseman overall
#852
Defenseman born in 2004
#940
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.