IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Félix Plamondon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-18 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0214 0.0235 0.1161 0.1273
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 68 2 13 15 0.221 0.1084 0.1135 0.5889 0.6165
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 4 17 21 0.328 0.1612 0.1608 0.8759 0.8739
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 7 25 32 0.500 0.2457 0.2335 1.3348 1.2687
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7755
Defenseman overall
#1629
Defenseman born in 2006
#913
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jared Kolquist
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Inger
New England College · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Rudek
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.