← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Carly Dann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-01 Country: Unknown
NCAA-W Projection
Cornell
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1207
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.31
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3256
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
15%
NCAA D3W
78%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 19 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2024-25 16U-AAA-W 16 2 4 6 0.375 0.1340 0.1340
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 11 2 1 3 0.273 0.1119 0.1119
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Dani Weiland 2024-25 · 0.96 PPG 0.300 Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Mollie Koch 2024-25 · 0.72 PPG Saint Mary's MIAC
Harper Poehling 2024-25 · 1.13 PPG 0.263 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Abby Reule 2022-23 · 0.69 PPG 0.450 Concordia MIAC
Charlotte Bellmont 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.