| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Sherbrooke Phoenix | QMJHL | 58 | 17 | 23 | 40 | 0.690 | 0.3435 | 0.3755 | 1.8403 | 2.0115 |
| 2025-26 | Sherbrooke Phoenix | QMJHL | 60 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 0.867 | 0.4316 | 0.4514 | 2.3125 | 2.4184 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.