← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Binkley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 11 2 0 2 0.182 0.0893 0.0887 0.4855 0.4823
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 60 18 25 43 0.717 0.3521 0.3331 1.9138 1.8106
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24091
Forward overall
#1148
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2023-24
0.44
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
SHL-J20 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
SuperElit 2020-21
0.57
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.