← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Falk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 42 16 7 23 0.548 0.2161 0.2226 0.7429 0.7653
2018-19 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 36 13 6 19 0.528 0.2083 0.2044 0.7161 0.7028
2019-20 Västerås IK U20 SuperElit 41 10 12 22 0.537 0.2117 0.2117 0.7280 0.7280
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 37 15 16 31 0.838 0.2977 0.2977 0.8837 0.8837
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 32 5 11 16 0.500
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA 26 0 7 7 0.269
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 33 9 2 11 0.333
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2021-22 · Alaska Fairbanks
+50.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16637
Forward overall
#725
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.