← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Coccimiglio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 14 25 39 0.722 0.1770 0.1868 0.4943 0.5217
2022-23 OJHL 53 16 34 50 0.943 0.2312 0.2322 0.6458 0.6485
2023-24 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 60 23 14 37 0.617 0.2191 0.2155 0.6475 0.6370
2024-25 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 41 5 10 15 0.366 0.1300 0.1211 0.3842 0.3578
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC 28 12 9 21 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2025-26 · Neumann
+451.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26903
Forward overall
#1542
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.