IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch El-Wailli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Prague High USHS-MN 25 1 9 10 0.400 0.0506 0.0478 0.0972 0.0919
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 27 1 4 5 0.185 0.0232 0.0224 0.0585 0.0564
2017-18 Wisconsin Muskies USPHL-Premier 43 20 19 39 0.907 0.1186 0.1090 0.3078 0.2830
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC SO 7 1 1 2 0.286
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 7 1 1 2 0.286
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8677
Defenseman overall
#1538
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Catron
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Palmer
Nichols · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Bradbury
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.