IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Soo Indians NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0863 0.2345 0.2481
2005-06 — NAHL 41 12 17 29 0.707 0.2599 0.2621 0.7466 0.7528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 2 0 2 2 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2007-08 · Manhattanville
+509.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22685
Forward overall
#758
Forward born in 1987
#1676
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Chouinard
Keene State · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Hipp
Saint John's · 2003-04
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Mazzetti
Elmira · 2000-01
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.