IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zack Chouinard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 42 27 30 57 1.357 0.1531 0.1558 0.4617 0.4699
2024-25 — NCDC 54 17 14 31 0.574 0.1327 0.1300 0.4642 0.4548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast FR 25 7 7 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2025-26 · Keene State
+366.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10242
Forward overall
#424
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Friesen
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Meo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.