Minnesota State
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0947
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.29
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3051
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
8%
NCAA D1W
10%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 29 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.414 | 0.0948 | 0.0947 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Amanda Kimmerle | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.059 | RPI |
| Megan Hinze | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.182 | Minnesota State |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lizzy Hamel | 2022-23 · 0.96 PPG | 0.316 | Colby | NESCAC |
| Brooklyn Riley | 2023-24 · 0.37 PPG | 0.806 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Alexis Oliveira | 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG | 0.609 | Alvernia | MAC |
| Amelia McQuay | 2023-24 · 0.71 PPG | 0.423 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Afton Hulke | 2022-23 · 0.96 PPG | 0.308 | Bethel | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.