← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Koller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-03-02 Country: USA
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins Elite 13U 13u-aaa 57 7 22 29 0.509 — — — —
2023-24 Pittsburgh Penguins Elite 14U 14u-aaa 65 4 17 21 0.323 — — — —
2024-25 Pittsburgh Penguins Elite 15U 15u-aaa 62 1 20 21 0.339 — — — —
2025-26 Oakland Jr. Grizzlies 16U AAA maha-16u 18 3 6 9 0.500 — — — —
2026-27 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1837 0.2027 0.5284 0.5830
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2018-19
0.35
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
QMJHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
USHL 2020-21
0.35
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2002-03
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.