← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Babiak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0590 0.0652 0.3003 0.3317
2016-17 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 28 2 8 10 0.357 0.1312 0.1423 0.3769 0.4088
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 40 1 4 5 0.125 0.0459 0.0475
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 46 1 10 11 0.239 0.0878 0.0870 0.2524 0.2500
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA 31 2 8 10 0.323
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA 31 1 8 9 0.290
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Bowling Green D1 WCHA 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18350
Defenseman overall
#2855
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Assumption · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2023-24
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.567 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.