← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stewart Sjoberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 33 6 4 10 0.303 0.0776 0.0801 0.2284 0.2357
2003-04 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 12 15 27 0.614 0.1572 0.1547 0.4625 0.4552
2004-05 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 52 11 12 23 0.442 0.1133 0.1059 0.3334 0.3118
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC SR 28 3 4 7 0.250
2007-08 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2006-07 Neumann D3 MAC SO 14 2 2 4 0.286
2005-06 Neumann D3 MAC FR 17 3 4 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2005-06 · Neumann
+283.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38339
Forward overall
#1112
Forward born in 1984
#967
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.