IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stewart Sjoberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 33 6 4 10 0.303 0.0875 0.0903 0.2281 0.2354
2003-04 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 12 15 27 0.614 0.1773 0.1745 0.4619 0.4546
2004-05 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 52 11 12 23 0.442 0.1278 0.1195 0.3330 0.3114
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 — SR 28 3 4 7 0.250
2007-08 Neumann D3 — JR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2006-07 Neumann D3 — SO 14 2 2 4 0.286
2005-06 Neumann D3 — FR 17 3 4 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2005-06 · Neumann
+240.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30653
Forward overall
#1027
Forward born in 1984
#1175
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hayden Ford
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustaf Arfelt
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Brenton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.