IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefano Pietrantonio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-15 Country: Canada
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 26 6 7 13 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 10 19 29 1.036 0.2052 0.2052 0.4719 0.4719
2024-25 Kent School NE-Prep 26 17 9 26 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 — —
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 27 1 2 3 0.111 0.0546 0.0542 0.2967 0.2943
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30980
Forward overall
#1113
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cooper Flinton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.56
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Alex Jasiek
USHL 2014-15
0.30
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Brock Cummings
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Nate Morgan
BCHL 2020-21
0.03
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Langworthy
Bethel · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Bottrell
Adrian · 2015-16
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.