← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefano Pietrantonio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-15 Country: Canada
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kent School NE-Prep 26 6 7 13 0.500 0.1006 0.1006 0.2286 0.2286
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 10 19 29 1.036 0.2083 0.2083 0.4736 0.4736
2024-25 Kent School NE-Prep 26 17 9 26 1.000 0.2011 0.2011 — —
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 27 1 2 3 0.111 0.0546 0.0542 0.2966 0.2942
2026-27 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.4913 0.4913 2.6696 2.6696
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31432
Forward overall
#1160
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2020-21
0.74
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
BCHL 2023-24
0.66
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
BCHL 2014-15
0.20
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NCDC 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.