| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 64 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 0.531 | 0.3948 | 0.4013 | 1.9821 | 2.0149 |
| 2005-06 | U.S. National U18 Team | NTDP-U18 | 42 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.524 | 0.3893 | 0.3767 | 1.9545 | 1.8915 |
| 2013-14 | Ilves | Liiga | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.077 | 0.1922 | 0.2046 | 0.6610 | 0.7035 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SR | 38 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2008-09 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | JR | 37 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.513 |
| 2007-08 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SO | 38 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.395 |
| 2006-07 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | FR | 43 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.302 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.