← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Ramage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-02-07 Country: USA
2010 · Round 4, Pick #103  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
Signed Professionally
Grizzlys Wolfsburg · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 45 4 5 9 0.200 0.0735 0.0819
2008-09 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 40 1 4 5 0.125 0.0929 0.0895 0.4664 0.4494
2019-20 Eisbären Berlin DEL 40 1 12 13 0.325 0.8125 0.8125 2.7554 2.7554
2020-21 Eisbären Berlin DEL 38 0 11 11 0.289 0.7237 0.7237 2.4544 2.4544
2021-22 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 49 2 23 25 0.510 1.2755 1.1109 4.3256 3.7675
2022-23 Schwenninger Wild Wings DEL 56 4 18 22 0.393 0.9823 0.8267 3.3311 2.8034
2023-24 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 52 1 14 15 0.288 0.7212 0.5700 2.4460 1.9331
2024-25 Grizzlys Wolfsburg DEL 51 2 17 19 0.372 0.9313 0.6932 3.1581 2.3507
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig SR 42 8 12 20 0.476
2011-12 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig JR 37 3 7 10 0.270
2010-11 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig SO 37 1 10 11 0.297
2009-10 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 41 2 10 12 0.293
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2009-10 · Wisconsin
+258.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1995
Defenseman overall
#395
Defenseman born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.