← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Florentino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-30 Country: USA
2013 · Round 5, Pick #143  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.4956 0.5030 2.4877 2.5247
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 30 9 7 16 0.533
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 31 5 7 12 0.387
2014-15 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 40 3 12 15 0.375
2013-14 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 30 5 6 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Providence
-29.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.