IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Fish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 44 12 16 28 0.636 0.2363 0.2392 0.6738 0.6822
2004-05 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 13 23 36 0.706 0.2621 0.2523 0.7474 0.7195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 27 7 13 20 0.741
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 26 6 11 17 0.654
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 27 13 15 28 1.037
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 27 9 16 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+337.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14442
Forward overall
#523
Forward born in 1985
#1003
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2014-15
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.