IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 11 3 8 11 1.000 0.3962 0.4228 1.0499 1.1204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Michigan D1 — SR 43 33 30 63 1.465
2006-07 Michigan D1 — JR 41 24 34 58 1.415
2005-06 Michigan D1 — SO 39 17 21 38 0.974
2004-05 Michigan D1 — FR 39 11 13 24 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2004-05 · Michigan
+70.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8984
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 1986
#186
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kero
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.