IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Stork Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 64 12 18 30 0.469 0.2765 0.2889 1.4080 1.4711
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 16 11 27 0.450 0.2655 0.2650 1.3515 1.3488
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 41 0 8 8 0.195
2016-17 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 39 6 8 14 0.359
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 33 6 8 14 0.424
2014-15 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 30 5 5 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Ohio State
+41.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17881
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 1995
#1741
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Daigle
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.