IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 27 36 63 1.340 0.1482 0.1520 0.4246 0.4355
2019-20 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 25 48 73 1.553 0.1718 0.1718 0.4921 0.4921
2020-21 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 39 26 40 66 1.692 0.1872 0.1872 0.5361 0.5361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SR 20 8 4 12 0.600
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA — 29 4 17 21 0.724
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA — 25 9 6 15 0.600
2022-23 King's D3 MAC — 8 3 4 7 0.875
2021-22 King's D3 MAC — 23 13 10 23 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2021-22 · King's
+668.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10962
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 2000
#107
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Andrade
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Phaneuf
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Sternbach
Hobart · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.