IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Andrade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 54 5 11 16 0.296 0.0726 0.0777 0.2040 0.2184
2022-23 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 53 12 20 32 0.604 0.1480 0.1509 0.4157 0.4238
2023-24 — OJHL 51 22 35 57 1.118 0.2739 0.2650 0.7695 0.7446
2024-25 — OJHL 55 15 36 51 0.927 0.2273 0.2083 0.6384 0.5849
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 25 10 8 18 0.720
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2025-26 · Buffalo State
+264.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18672
Forward overall
#955
Forward born in 2004
#680
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bohn
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.