IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Phaneuf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 57 14 16 30 0.526 0.1489 0.1687 0.3316 0.3758
2007-08 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 26 13 23 36 1.385 0.3917 0.4228 0.8724 0.9417
2008-09 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 23 9 16 25 1.087 0.3075 0.3167 0.6849 0.7055
2009-10 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 56 21 53 74 1.321 0.3818 0.3595 0.9947 0.9366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 5 1 1 2 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2011-12 · St. Scholastica
+36.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8608
Forward overall
#359
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Ecklund
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.