IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taurin Haddon-Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 35 17 28 45 1.286 0.1731 0.1731 0.4377 0.4377
2021-22 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 43 33 55 88 2.046 0.2755 0.2595 0.6966 0.6561
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 4 14 18 0.692
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 6 9 15 0.600
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SO 28 8 5 13 0.464
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE FR 22 1 9 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2022-23 · Curry
+104.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16369
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 2001
#85
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kullan Daikawa
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Johnson
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.