← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Kloos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-30 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 10 3 2 5 0.500 0.2949 0.3174 1.5004 1.6150
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 2 2 4 2.000 1.1798 1.2149 6.0014 6.1797
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 54 29 58 87 1.611 0.9504 0.9281 4.8344 4.7208
2020-21 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 48 11 9 20 0.417 1.0417 1.0417 5.7405 5.7405
2021-22 Leksands IF SHL 45 9 13 22 0.489 1.2223 1.1388 6.3755 5.9401
2022-23 Leksands IF SHL 43 13 14 27 0.628 1.5697 1.4255 8.1881 7.4357
2023-24 Leksands IF SHL 37 7 17 24 0.649 1.6215 1.3679 8.4580 7.1352
2024-25 Leksands IF SHL 52 18 15 33 0.635 1.5865 1.2455 8.2754 6.4966
2025-26 HV71 SHL 50 10 15 25 0.500 1.2500 1.2500 6.5202 6.5202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 37 18 24 42 1.135
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 37 16 27 43 1.162
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 39 13 19 32 0.821
2013-14 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 41 16 16 32 0.780
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2013-14 · Minnesota
-30.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#549
Forward overall
#36
Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.