IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Cangelosi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Nürnberg Ice Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 53 29 30 59 1.113 0.6843 0.7299 3.2797 3.4983
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 21 43 64 1.143 0.7025 0.7120 3.3672 3.4125
2019-20 Nürnberg Ice Tigers DEL 14 2 1 3 0.214 0.2344 0.2344 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 21 14 35 0.897
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 41 20 17 37 0.902
2013-14 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 10 16 26 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.67
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2013-14 · Boston College
-2.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5826
Forward overall
#289
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alex Kile
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schilkey
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.