IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.T. Henke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — USHL 41 6 12 18 0.439 0.2590 0.2727 1.3143 1.3836
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 20 34 54 1.317 0.3697 0.3532 1.0832 1.0350
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 36 9 18 27 0.750
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 10 20 30 0.833
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 37 10 12 22 0.595
2013-14 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 21 1 7 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2013-14 · Maine
+63.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13560
Forward overall
#569
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.