IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Davison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1284 0.5892 0.6156
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 57 5 8 13 0.228 0.1402 0.1390 0.6720 0.6663
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 31 1 6 7 0.226
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 35 1 14 15 0.429
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 35 5 9 14 0.400
2014-15 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 32 2 7 9 0.281
2013-14 Wisconsin D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11673
Defenseman overall
#1522
Defenseman born in 1994
#3447
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Kernan
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hodd-Chlebeck
Saint John's · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Brown
Bethel · 2019-20
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.