← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Mahlmeister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampton NE-Prep 32 5 3 8 0.250 0.0495 0.0495 0.1139 0.1139
2019-20 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 20 19 39 1.114 0.2207 0.2207 0.5077 0.5077
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0627 0.0627 0.1236 0.1236
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 9 14 23 0.489 0.1995 0.1854 0.3934 0.3656
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 12 8 20 0.833
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 4 7 11 0.478
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 7 7 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+256.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22888
Forward overall
#1140
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.