IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Mahlmeister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampton NE-Prep 32 5 3 8 0.250 0.0504 0.0504 0.1144 0.1144
2019-20 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 20 19 39 1.114 0.2246 0.2246 0.5100 0.5100
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0433 0.0433 0.1245 0.1245
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 9 14 23 0.489 0.1379 0.1282 0.3962 0.3682
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 12 8 20 0.833
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 4 7 11 0.478
2022-23 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 23 7 7 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2022-23 · SUNY Potsdam
+326.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31961
Forward overall
#1310
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Reitter
Canton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Topher Flanagan
Amherst · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.