← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Elk River/Zimmerman USHS-MN 28 10 16 26 0.929 0.1144 0.1144 0.2256 0.2256
2020-21 Elk River/Zimmerman USHS-MN 20 13 16 29 1.450 0.1786 0.1786 0.3522 0.3522
2021-22 Elk River/Zimmerman USHS-MN 28 25 24 49 1.750 0.2156 0.2156 0.4251 0.4251
2022-23 NAHL 36 3 2 5 0.139 0.0493 0.0489 0.1458 0.1446
2023-24 Provo Predators NCDC 23 7 6 13 0.565 0.1306 0.1226 0.4570 0.4291
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC 18 2 2 4 0.222
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC 18 2 5 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2024-25 · Concordia
+388.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19029
Forward overall
#971
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.