IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Schueneman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 — USHL 26 3 9 12 0.462 0.2939 0.3128 1.3830 1.4719
2013-14 — USHL 60 3 19 22 0.367 0.2335 0.2376 1.0989 1.1181
2014-15 — USHL 58 16 30 46 0.793 0.5050 0.4890 2.3767 2.3014
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 37 3 18 21 0.568
2017-18 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 34 5 21 26 0.765
2016-17 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 38 5 17 22 0.579
2015-16 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 35 1 12 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Western Michigan
1.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#685
Defenseman overall
#228
Defenseman born in 1995
#1042
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.