IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Marnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 51 15 10 25 0.490 0.3122 0.3277 1.4690 1.5419
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 47 10 12 22 0.468 0.2981 0.2989 1.4028 1.4067
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 31 12 10 22 0.710
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 25 15 12 27 1.080
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 27 7 6 13 0.481
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 32 11 6 17 0.531
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2014-15 · St. Lawrence
+99.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10165
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 1995
#1615
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Andrew
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.