IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nash Worden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 46 0 4 4 0.087 0.0345 0.0395 0.0913 0.1045
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 2 4 6 0.118 0.0723 0.0763 0.3465 0.3659
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 34 3 7 10 0.294 0.1808 0.1824 0.8665 0.8744
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 47 3 8 11 0.234 0.1438 0.1380 0.6894 0.6618
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Army D1 AHA JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Army D1 AHA SO 10 0 1 1 0.100
2015-16 Army D1 AHA FR 36 0 6 6 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Army
+13.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11777
Defenseman overall
#1614
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trent Cassan
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2007-08
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Weitzman
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.