IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

D'Arcy Oakes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 10 22 32 0.667 0.1634 0.1730 0.4590 0.4861
2006-07 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 22 14 36 0.750 0.1838 0.1854 0.5164 0.5210
2007-08 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 36 36 72 1.241 0.4783 0.4655 1.8066 1.7583
2008-09 Powell River Kings BCHL 59 42 57 99 1.678 0.6465 0.6021 2.4420 2.2742
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC — 23 5 10 15 0.652
2011-12 Elmira D3 UCHC — 24 7 6 13 0.542
2010-11 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 7 0 1 1 0.143
2009-10 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 27 5 6 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2009-10 · Quinnipiac
-20.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6214
Forward overall
#268
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Goudreau
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.