IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 6 14 20 0.357 0.2840 0.2918 1.3374 1.3740
2013-14 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 59 2 26 28 0.475 0.3775 0.3672 1.7775 1.7288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 34 1 6 7 0.206
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2015-16 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 36 3 8 11 0.306
2014-15 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 22 0 3 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2014-15 · Minnesota
-57.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2093
Defenseman overall
#522
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Brodzinski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Nuttle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.