← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Wahlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.4246 0.4771 1.9979 2.2450
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 10 2 1 3 0.300 0.1910 0.2057 0.8990 0.9681
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 15 26 41 0.695 0.4425 0.4548 2.0824 2.1401
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 55 15 30 45 0.818 0.5210 0.5112 2.4519 2.4060
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 34 4 8 12 0.353
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 27 1 4 5 0.185
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 31 5 6 11 0.355
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 35 6 6 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2016-17 · St. Cloud State
-18.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4654
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 1996
#726
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.