IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Manley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.3074 0.3405 1.4731 1.6316
2013-14 Austin Bruins NAHL 46 1 3 4 0.087 0.0345 0.0378 0.0913 0.1001
2014-15 Estevan Bruins SJHL 48 4 9 13 0.271 0.0825 0.0861 0.2007 0.2095
2015-16 Estevan Bruins SJHL 53 2 18 20 0.377 0.1150 0.1144 0.2797 0.2782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 RPI D1 ECAC — 21 1 0 1 0.048
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC — 24 1 1 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2016-17 · RPI
-14.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19250
Defenseman overall
#2319
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Jensen
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Leslie
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lewis Crosby
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.